Funding Opportunity ID: |
323130 |
Opportunity Number: |
USGS-FA-20-0046 |
Opportunity Title: |
Notice of Intent: Western Great Basin Geodetic Network Operations: MAGNET 2020-2025 |
Opportunity Category: |
Discretionary |
Opportunity Category Explanation: |
|
Funding Instrument Type: |
Cooperative Agreement |
Category of Funding Activity: |
Other (see text field entitled “Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity” for clarification) |
Category Explanation: |
Natural Hazards |
CFDA Number(s): |
15.808 |
Eligible Applicants: |
Public and State controlled institutions of higher education |
Additional Information on Eligibility: |
|
Agency Code: |
DOI-USGS1 |
Agency Name: |
Department of the Interior U. S. Geological Survey |
Posted Date: |
Dec 17, 2019 |
Close Date: |
Dec 31, 2019 |
Last Updated Date: |
Dec 17, 2019 |
Award Ceiling: |
$722,390 |
Award Floor: |
$72,239 |
Estimated Total Program Funding: |
|
Expected Number of Awards: |
1 |
Description: |
Notice of Intent to award a cooperative agreement to the University of Nevada Reno (UNR) pursuant to the Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) in support of the project entitled "Western Great Basin Geodetic Network Operations: MAGNET 2020-2025". The main objective of the project is long-term monitoring of interseismic deformation for dynamic seismic hazard assessment and investigation of fault creep and transient phenomena, and use of real-time and near real-time data for earthquake likelihood forecasting, earthquake early warning, rapid response, and assessment of immediate postseismic motion of the Great Basin Region.UNR is uniquely qualified to carry out the objectives as they are the only USGS-supported geodetic network in the Great Basin region. UNR has a well-developed network staff that is also of great benefit to this proposed study. The PI has been extensively involved with this effort as a geodetic network operator for the MAGNET geodetic network. In addition, specialized equipment is needed for monitoring and has been deployed by UNR in the regions of monitoring. Some of the field sensors and central recording and computing equipment is university-owned and would not be available to another source. Furthermore, data from the instruments is transmitted to the universities’ facilities and relocation of the data receiving point and telemetry equipment would be costly and time-consuming. |
Version: |
1 |